Cases 1 - 10 of 10
HAFFORD v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2009cv00193
Plaintiff:
BOBBY HAFFORD
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
RAYE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2008cv00248
Petitioner:
JAMES W RAYE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
DOLLIVER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2008cv00244
Petitioner:
DARRELL DOLLIVER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
LEMIEUX v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2007cv00151
Petitioner:
STEVEN LEMIEUX
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
MAHONE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2007cv00148
Petitioner:
MICHAEL A MAHONE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
PERKINS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2007cv00079
Petitioner:
LARRY PERKINS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
SANFORD v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2007cv00050
Petitioner:
DAVID SANFORD
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
ALLEN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2007cv00039
Petitioner:
EUGENE ERWIN ALLEN, JR
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
ARBOUR v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2007cv00026
Petitioner:
FRANK ARBOUR
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
LELAND v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2007cv00010
Petitioner:
WILLIAM LELAND
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
