Cases 1 - 10 of 92
Frascarelli v. U. S. Parole Commission
as 22-60159
Petitioner:
Robert Frascarelli
Respondent:
United States Parole Commission
Herbert HinesIn re: Herbert Hines
as 21-30663
Petitioner:
In re: Herbert Hines
Respondent:
Calvin Johnson, United States Parole Commission and Patricia K. Cushwa
Calvin Wedington v. USA, et al
as 21-5235
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Calvin Scott Wedington
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America and United States Parole Commission
Tony Weems v. Patricia Cushwa, et al
as 21-5189
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Tony Weems
Defendant / Appellee:
Patricia Cushwa, Commissioner of the United States Parole Commission, Patricia Wilson-Smoot, Commissioner of the United Parole Commission, Charles Massarone, Commissioner of the United Parole Commission and others
James Lee Pinkerton v. United States Parole Commission
as 2:2021cv05739
Plaintiff:
James Lee Pinkerton
Defendant:
United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Artie Dufur v. USPC
as 21-5089
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Artie Dufur
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Parole Commission
Warren v. Myers
as 21-30173
Respondent / Appellee:
Rodney Myers and United States Parole Commission
Petitioner / Appellant:
Jack Wade Warren
NEWMAN v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2020cv03761
Plaintiff:
JOHN NEWMAN
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Matthew Faison v. USPC, et al
as 20-56232
Defendant / Appellee:
MONICA HENDRY, State of Florida Attorney General, official capacity, STATE OF FLORIDA PROBATION AND PAROLE COMMISSION and UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW L. FAISON
Lonnie Foster v. Warden, et al
as 20-10841
Respondent / Appellee:
Mansfield Law Enforcement Center, NFN Warden, Federal Detention Center, Seagoville and United States Parole Commission
Petitioner / Appellant:
Lonnie L. Foster
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
