Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2018cv00018
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Patterson v. United States Parole Commission
as 6:2017cv00243
Petitioner:
James R. Patterson
Respondent:
United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Patterson v. United States Parole Commission
as 6:2017cv00211
Petitioner:
James R. Patterson
Respondent:
United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Sowell vs. US Department of Justice
as 6:2017cv00008
Petitioner:
James Odis Sowell, Jr.
Respondent:
United States Department of Justice , United States Parole Commission and Warden of FCI Manchester
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Upshur-Bey v. Sepanek et al
as 7:2015cv00049
Petitioner:
Charles V. Upshur-Bey
Respondent:
M. Sepanek and United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Dodd v. United States Parole Commission
as 7:2013cv00131
Plaintiff:
Raymond Dodd
Defendant:
United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Henry v. Farley et al
as 7:2013cv00087
Petitioner:
Derrick Henry
Respondent:
Robert Farley and United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Blue Thunder v. United States Parole Commission et al
as 5:2013cv00187
Petitioner:
James David Blue Thunder
Respondent:
United States Parole Commission and Francisco Quintana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Tarpley v. United States Parole Commission
as 7:2012cv00097
Petitioner:
Anthony Tarpley
Respondent:
United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Upshur-Bey v. United States Parole Commission et al
as 7:2010cv00127
Plaintiff:
Charles V. Upshur-Bey
Defendant:
United States Parole Commission and Janice Bradford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
