Cases 1 - 10 of 31
REAVES v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 3:2020cv00166
Petitioner:
Harold Reaves
Respondent:
United States Parole Commission and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA (C.S.C.O.A.)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Young v. Ebbert
as 3:2016cv02447
Petitioner:
Reginald Young, Jr.
Respondent:
David J. Ebbert and United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Vaughn v. United States Parole Commission et al
as 1:2016cv01072
Petitioner:
Ronnie Vaughn
Respondent:
United States Parole Commission, C Maiorana, The Chair of the Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Chapman v. United States Parole Commission
as 3:2015cv02350
Plaintiff:
Gregory Chapman
Defendant:
United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Coleman v. United States Parole Commission
as 3:2015cv00943
Petitioner:
James Coleman
Respondent:
United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Fields v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2015cv00575
Plaintiff:
Leonidas R. Fields
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Zickerfoose, United States Parole Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MOORE v. SPAULDING et al
as 1:2015cv00503
Petitioner:
Samuel Moore, Jr.
Respondent:
S. Spaulding and United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bolt v. United States Parole Commission
as 3:2014cv02421
Petitioner:
Rodnell Bolt
Defendant:
United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Reaves v. Hudson
as 3:2014cv01325
Petitioner:
Harold Reaves
Respondent:
D. Hudson and United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SHEFFIELD v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 4:2013cv01629
Plaintiff:
Stephen Sheffield
Defendant:
United States Parole Commission and Scott Kubic
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.