Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Rios v. Versaggi
as 6:2023cv00904
Plaintiff:
Robert Israel Rios
Defendant:
Joseph Versaggi and Unknown Agents (pending discovery)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tamfu v. Martin et al
as 8:2021cv02343
Plaintiff:
Charles Tamfu
Defendant:
Jessica Martin, Monika Nagy, Melissa Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jo v. Six Unknown Agents et al
as 6:2020cv01656
Plaintiff:
Young Yil Jo
Defendant:
Donald Trump, Six Unknown Agents, Proland Management and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Al-Imarah v. Waltron et al
as 1:2020cv23614
Plaintiff:
Abdul-Jalil Rashid Al-Imarah and Samuel Baptiste
Defendant:
Special Agent Timothy Dietz, Joint Terrror Task Force-Miami, Special Agent Daniel Gaitan and others
Jo v. Six Unknown Agents et al
as 6:2019cv00612
Plaintiff:
Young Yil Jo
Defendant:
Donald Trump, Six Unknown Agents and Barack Obama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jo v. Six Unknown Agents et al
as 6:2018cv02125
Plaintiff:
Young Yil Jo
Defendant:
Donald Trump, Dept of H.U.D., Six Unknown Agents and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
D'AMICO v. JONES et al
as 4:2018cv00494
Defendant:
ROBERT SMITH, RAMON BASSA, N ANANDJIWAH and others
Plaintiff:
STEVEN FRANCIS D'AMICO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jo v. Six Unknown Agents et al
as 6:2017cv02127
Plaintiff:
Young Yil Jo
Defendant:
Six Unknown Agents, Barack Obama and Donald Trump
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WADDELL v. SEVERAL UNKNOWN AGENTS OF HOLMES COUNTY FLORIDA et al
as 5:2017cv00300
Plaintiff:
DAVID MITCHELL WADDELL
Defendant:
SEVERAL UNKNOWN AGENTS OF HOLMES COUNTY FLORIDA, RYAN SEAGERS, MIKE MOORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sarokim et al v. Six Unknown Agents et al
as 6:2017cv00291
Plaintiff:
Jeugini Sarokim and Young Yil Jo
Defendant:
Six Unknown Agents, Barack Obama and Donald Trump
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
