Cases 31 - 40 of 232
POLSTON v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 2:2022cv00824
Plaintiff:
PAMELA POLSTON
Defendant:
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
LESTER v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 2:2022cv00823
Plaintiff:
CAROL LESTER
Defendant:
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
FINADY v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 5:2022cv00816
Plaintiff:
JODI FINADY
Defendant:
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
ZIMMERMAN v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 2:2022cv00822
Plaintiff:
CHANELLE ZIMMERMAN
Defendant:
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
PAUL-CHADHA v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 2:2022cv00730
Plaintiff:
RICHA PAUL-CHADHA
Defendant:
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
TAYLOR v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 2:2022cv00536
Plaintiff:
STEPHANIE TAYLOR
Defendant:
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
MORGAN v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 2:2022cv00237
Plaintiff:
BRIAN MORGAN
Defendant:
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
NEILL v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 2:2022cv00389
Plaintiff:
HANNAH NEILL
Defendant:
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
JENNINGS v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 2:2022cv00375
Plaintiff:
SALIK JENNINGS
Defendant:
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
GARCIA BULKLEY v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 2:2022cv00011
Plaintiff:
MARIA GARCIA BULKLEY
Defendant:
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
