Cases 11 - 20 of 340
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv05975
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
Coffman v. UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc.
as 2:2023cv02495
Plaintiff:
Jill H. Coffman
Defendant:
UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Coffman v. UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc.
as 2:2023at01069
Plaintiff:
Jill H. Coffman
Defendant:
UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv01666
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Desmond Beristain v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv07241
Plaintiff:
Desmond Beristain
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc., UPS Capital Corporation and DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv06617
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Tonisha Truelove v. UPS Supply Chain Solutions General Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv06088
Plaintiff:
Tonisha Truelove
Defendant:
UPS Supply Chain Solutions General Services, Inc., United Parcel Service, Inc. and Does 1-100, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv05445
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Lavale Burns v. UP Fintech Holding Limited et al
as 2:2023cv04842
Plaintiff:
Lavale Burns
Defendant:
UP Fintech Holding Limited, Tianhua Wu and John Fei Zeng
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00848
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
