Cases 31 - 40 of 101
Cobble v. US Attorney General et al
as 1:2019mc00015
Respondent:
Cherokee DA, GDC Commissioner, US Attorney General and others
Petitioner:
DANIEL ERIC COBBLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BILUS v. US ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 1:2019cv00087
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, US ATTORNEY GENERAL and SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Plaintiff:
ROBERT BILUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hair v. United States Of America et al
as 1:2019cv21614
Defendant:
FCI Miami (low) Warden, Director of US Federal Bureau of Prisons, State of Florida Attorney General and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Mathew Hair
Gupta v. US Attorney General
as 1:2019cv21545
Plaintiff:
Anesh Gupta
Defendant:
US Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
DEMOS v. USA et al
as 1:2019cv00020
Defendant:
US HOUSE, US CONGRESS, US SENATE and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mehmood v. US Attorney General et al
as 1:2019cv20047
Petitioner:
Yasir Mehmood
Respondent:
Secretary of DHS and US Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Galiana Cagigal v. US Attorney General
as 3:2018cv01263
Respondent:
Warden, US Attorney General, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security and others
Petitioner:
Alberto H. Galiana Cagigal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Acierda v. US Attorney General et al
as 3:2018cv01243
Petitioner:
Maxwell Escabusa Acierda
Respondent:
Scotty Rhoden, US Attorney General and John Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Borrego v. US Attorney General et al
as 3:2018cv01220
Respondent:
John Kelly, US Attorney General and Scotty Rhoden
Petitioner:
Adalberto Rodriguez Borrego
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Serrano Gonzalez v. US Attorney General et al
as 3:2018cv01183
Respondent:
Secretary Department of Homeland Security, Warden and US Attorney General
Petitioner:
Ihosvani Serrano Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
