Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Adan Bautista Morales v. US Penitentiary Victorville et al
as 5:2013cv00221
Defendant:
Mr Aird, Mr. Allen, Mr Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Adan Bautista Morales
Johnson v. US Attorney General
as 2:2011cv02418
Petitioner:
Vernell Johnson
Respondent:
US Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Amel Dalluge v. US Department of Justice, et al
as 11-35378
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AMEL DALLUGE
Defendant - Appellee:
US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, all actors to be interpreted broadly, ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, US Attorney General and CORRESPONDENCE MANAGEMENT STAFF, unknown names
Powell v. US Attorney General
as 1:2008cv00309
Petitioner:
Carlos Powell
Respondent:
US Attorney General
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gomis v. US Secretary of State et al
as 5:2008cv03418
Petitioner:
Antoine Gomis
Defendant:
US Secretary of State, US DHS Secretary, US Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jaime Ornelas v. Eric H. Holder Jr., et al
as 08-35494
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAIME ALVAREZ ORNELAS
Respondent - Appellee:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, US Attorney General, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, A. NEIL CLARK, ICE Field Office Director, District of Washington State and others
Michael Wayne Eggers v. US Attorney General et al
as 2:2008cv00986
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne Eggers
Defendant:
US Attorney General, United States of America, Gary Penrod and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv02259
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 07-56261
Petitioner - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
