Cases 1 - 9 of 9
SMITH v. DESANTIS et al
as 4:2022cv00411
Plaintiff:
TYRONE L SMITH
Defendant:
RON DESANTIS, ASHLEY MOODY, US Attorney General MERRICK GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gayden v. Clements et al
as 5:2022cv00171
Petitioner:
M.D. John Matthew Gayden, Jr. and John Matthew Gayden, Jr.
Defendant:
Stephen Clements and US Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Raghubir v. United States of America et al
as 6:2021cv01714
Plaintiff:
Vinodh Raghubir
Defendant:
United States of America, State of Florida, US Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Haile et al v. Collins et al
as 1:2021cv20851
Plaintiff:
John Haile, DRF, PBS and others
Defendant:
Ashley Moody, Inspector General of the United States, Clifford Rhodes, P.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raghubir v. United States of America et al
as 6:2020cv01692
Defendant:
US Department of Justice, 2nd Judicial Circuit, United States of America and others
Plaintiff:
Vinodh Raghubir
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raghubir et al v. United States of America et al
as 6:2020cv01515
Defendant:
US Department of Justice, F.D.L.E., Pacer and others
Plaintiff:
Vinodh Raghubir and U.S Citizens within 11th Circuit Boundaries
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hair v. United States Of America et al
as 1:2019cv21614
Defendant:
FCI Miami (low) Warden, Director of US Federal Bureau of Prisons, State of Florida Attorney General and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Mathew Hair
DEMOS v. USA et al
as 1:2019cv00020
Defendant:
US HOUSE, US CONGRESS, US SENATE and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guarino v. Hernandez et al
as 1:2007cv22498
Plaintiff:
Beniamino Guarino
Defendant:
Fausto Hernandez, Unknown name of Second Employee of BOP, Unknown name of Third Employe of BOP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
