Cases 11 - 20 of 45
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv03909
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
WILSON et al v. BARBER et al
as 2:2014cv03241
Plaintiff:
SCOTT WILSON and MELISSA WILSON
Defendant:
KURT BARBER, CHAUTAUQUA AIRLINES, INC., REPUBLIC AIRWAYS HOLDINGS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv07407
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
O'GRADY v. US AIRWAYS, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv05933
Plaintiff:
ANGELINE O'GRADY
Defendant:
US AIRWAYS, INC. , US AIRWAYS GROUP, INC. , PRIME FLIGHT AVIATION SERVICES, INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv05679
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
VELAZQUEZ et al v. US AIRWAYS, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv05508
Plaintiff:
SONIA VELAZQUEZ and ROSA VELAZQUEZ
Defendant:
US AIRWAYS, INC. , US AIRWAYS and PRIMEFLIGHT AVIATION SERVICES
Cross_claimant:
US AIRWAYS and US AIRWAYS, INC.
Cross_defendant:
PRIMEFLIGHT AVIATION SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv05270
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
LONDON v. US AIRWAYS GROUP, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv04464
Plaintiff:
JAMES LONDON
Defendant:
US AIRWAYS GROUP, INC. and US AIRWAYS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv02631
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Act of 1993
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01279
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
