Cases 21 - 30 of 82
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv07407
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
O'GRADY v. US AIRWAYS, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv05933
Plaintiff:
ANGELINE O'GRADY
Defendant:
US AIRWAYS, INC. , US AIRWAYS GROUP, INC. , PRIME FLIGHT AVIATION SERVICES, INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv05679
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
VELAZQUEZ et al v. US AIRWAYS, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv05508
Plaintiff:
SONIA VELAZQUEZ and ROSA VELAZQUEZ
Defendant:
US AIRWAYS, INC. , US AIRWAYS and PRIMEFLIGHT AVIATION SERVICES
Cross_claimant:
US AIRWAYS and US AIRWAYS, INC.
Cross_defendant:
PRIMEFLIGHT AVIATION SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv05463
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv05270
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv05042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
LONDON v. US AIRWAYS GROUP, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv04464
Plaintiff:
JAMES LONDON
Defendant:
US AIRWAYS GROUP, INC. and US AIRWAYS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
GONZALEZ-MARCANO v. US AIRWAYS GROUP, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv03714
Plaintiff:
BRUNILDA GONZALEZ-MARCANO
Defendant:
US AIRWAYS GROUP, INC. , JOHN DOE, INC. and ABC INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv02631
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Act of 1993
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
