Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00326
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Haskologlu v. US Department of Homeland Security et al
as 2:2023cv14347
Plaintiff:
Isa Haskologlu
Defendant:
US DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, US CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES and UR MENDOZA JADDOU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv04460
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
LLIVIZUPA v. US CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES (USCIS)
as 2:2021cv20682
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL CAJILEMA LLIVIZUPA
Defendant:
US CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES (USCIS)
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv20683
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv19322
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv18181
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 145
DA COSTA et al v. US CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES (USCIS)
as 2:2021cv17657
Plaintiff:
JOAO CARNEIRO DA COSTA, TIAGO CATELA DA COSTA and MARIA CODINHO CATELA DA COSTA
Defendant:
US CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES (USCIS)
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv04697
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
