Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Washington County v. US Department of the Interior et al
as 4:2024cv00067
Defendant:
US Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management and US Fish and Wildlife Service
Plaintiff:
Washington County
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Center for Biological Diversity et al v. US Department of the Interior et al
as 2:2019cv00636
Defendant:
US Bureau of Reclamation and US Department of the Interior
Plaintiff:
Living Rivers, Utah Rivers Council, Colorado Riverkeeper and others
Petitioner:
Utah Board of Water Resources and State of Utah
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551
Living Rivers et al v. Bernhardt et al
as 4:2019cv00041
Plaintiff:
Grand Canyon Trust, Utah Physicians for a Healthy Environment, Living Rivers and others
Defendant:
US Department of the Interior, David Bernhardt, US Bureau of Land Management and others
Petitioner:
Enefit American Oil
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance et al v. US Department of the Interior et al
as 2:2019cv00297
Defendant:
Bureau of Land Management, US Department of the Interior and Ahmed Mohsen
Plaintiff:
Wilderness Society, The, National Parks Conservation Association and Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
Utah Physicians for a Healthy Environment et al v. U.S. Bureau of Land Management et al
as 2:2019cv00256
Plaintiff:
Grand Canyon Trust, Utah Physicians for a Healthy Environment, Sierra Club and others
Defendant:
US Department of the Interior, David Bernhardt, U.S. Bureau of Land Management and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
Friends of Cedar Mesa v. US Department of the Interior et al
as 4:2019cv00013
Defendant:
Bureau of Land Management, US Department of the Interior and Kent Hoffman
Plaintiff:
Friends of Cedar Mesa
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
