Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Acevedo Vives v. US
as 24-1133
Plaintiff:
MAYDA I. ACEVEDO and MAYDA I. ACEVEDO VIVES
Defendant:
US DEPT OF THE INTERIOR, UNITED STATES and US ATTORNEYS OFFICE, for the District of Puerto Rico
Responsible Offshore Development Alliance v. US Dept of the Interior, et al
as 23-2051
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RESPONSIBLE OFFSHORE DEVELOPMENT ALLIANCE, a D.C. nonprofit corporation
Defendant / Appellee:
US DEPT OF THE INTERIOR, DEBRA HAALAND, in her official capacity as the Secretary of the Interior, BUREAU OF OCEAN ENERGY MANAGEMENT and others
Interested Party:
CLEAN OCEAN ACTION, INC.
Seafreeze Shoreside, Inc., et al v. US Dep't of the Interior, et al
as 23-1853
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SEAFREEZE SHORESIDE, INC., LONG ISLAND COMMERCIAL FISHING ASSOC., INC., XIII NORTHEAST FISHERY SECTOR, INC. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
US DEPT OF THE INTERIOR, DEBRA HAALAND, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Department of the Interior, BUREAU OF OCEAN ENERGY MANAGEMENT and others
Melone v. Coit, et al
as 23-1736
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS MELONE
Plaintiff:
ALLCO RENEWABLE ENERGY, LTD. and ALLCO FINANCE LTD
Defendant / Appellee:
JANET COIT, in her official capacity as Assistant Administrator, National Marine Fisheries Service, NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE, JANET COIT, in her official capacity of Assistant Administrator, National Marine Fisheries Service and others
Intervenor / Appellee:
VINEYARD WIND 1, LLC
Defendant:
DEBRA HAALAND, in her official capacity of Secretary of the Interior, JOHN A. ATILANO, II, Colonel, in his official capacity of Commander and District Engineer, MARTHA WILLIAMS, in her official capacity of Principal Deputy Director and others
Intervenor:
SOUTH FORK WIND, LLC
Interested Party:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
Seafreeze Shoreside, Inc., et al v. US Dep't of the Interior, et al
as 23-1473
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SEAFREEZE SHORESIDE, INC., LONG ISLAND COMMERCIAL FISHING ASSOC., INC., XIII NORTHEAST FISHERY SECTOR, INC. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
US DEPT OF THE INTERIOR, DEBRA HAALAND, The Honorable, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Department of the Interior, BUREAU OF OCEAN ENERGY MANAGEMENT and others
Interested Party:
VINEYARD WIND 1, LLC
Littlefield, et al v. US Dept of the Interior, et al
as 23-1197
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID LITTLEFIELD, MICHELLE LITTLEFIELD, TRACY ACORD and others
Defendant / Appellee:
US DEPT OF THE INTERIOR, DEBRA HAALAND, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Interior, BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS, of the Department of the Interior of the United States of America and others
Littlefield, et al v. US Dept of the Interior, et al
as 16-2481
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DAVID LITTLEFIELD, MICHELLE LITTLEFIELD, TRACY ACORD and others
Defendant - Appellant:
US DEPT OF THE INTERIOR, SALLY JEWELL, in her official capacity as Secretary - U.S. Department of the Interior, BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS, U.S. Department of the Interior and others
Defendant:
MASHPEE WAMPANOAG INDIAN TRIBE
Interested Party:
TAUNTON, MA and USET SOVEREIGNTY PROTECTION FUND, INC.
Littlefield, et al v. US Dept of the Interior, et al
as 16-2484
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DAVID LITTLEFIELD, MICHELLE LITTLEFIELD, TRACY ACORD and others
Defendant - Appellee:
BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS, U.S. Department of the Interior, SALLY JEWELL, in her official capacity as Secretary - U.S. Department of the Interior, LAWRENCE ROBERTS, Acting Assistant Secretary, Indian Affairs, U.S. Department of the Interior and others
Defendant - Appellant:
MASHPEE WAMPANOAG INDIAN TRIBE
Interested Party:
TAUNTON, MA and USET SOVEREIGNTY PROTECTION FUND, INC.
US Dept of the Interior v. FERC
as 13-2439
Petitioner:
US DEPT OF THE INTERIOR
Respondent:
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Nulankeyutmonen Nkihtaqmikon v. Bureau of Indian Affair
as 10-2110
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NULANKEYUTMONEN NKIHTAQMIKON
Defendant - Appellee:
BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS and US DEPT OF THE INTERIOR
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
