Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Vilaychith Khouanmany v. US Marshal Service, et al
as 20-16285
Defendant / Appellee:
SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, ALENCASTRE, US MARSHAL SERVICE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VILAYCHITH KHOUANMANY
Abubakar Ahmed v. Arizona State University, et al
as 19-15086
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL ROPER, named as Arizona State Police Officer, JOHN CHIPOLSKY, agent of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, SUZANNE SOLOMON, named as Arizona State University Police Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ABUBAKAR HUSSEIN AHMED
Defendant:
UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as Does 15-25 and UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as Does 15-20
Donahoe v. Kautter et al
as 3:2018cv05631
Defendant:
Betts, Patterson, Mines P.S., Ferris Beverly Donahoe, Albertsons and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Douglas Donahoe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gambill v. Pierce County Superior Court and Clerk's Office et al
as 3:2015cv05077
Plaintiff:
Bruce E. Gambill, Jr.
Defendant:
Pierce County Superior Court and Clerk's Office, US Bankruptcy Court, US District Court and others
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Hector Casas-Montejano v. Eric Holder, Jr., et al
as 12-15023
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HECTOR ROGELIO CASAS-MONTEJANO, AKA Hector Roger Casas
Defendant - Appellee:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, PATRICK WILLIAM MCLAUGHLIN, Assistant US Attorney, BENJAMIN B. WAGNER, US Attorney and others
Jones v. US Department of Justice et al
as 4:2011cv00565
Plaintiff:
Charles C. Jones
Defendant:
US Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation, US Marshals and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Strolberg, et al v. Akal Security, Inc., et al
as 1:2003cv00004
Plaintiff:
Ron Strolberg , Charles Hawkins , Carl Benjamin and others
Defendant:
US Marshals Service , Justice, US Dept of and USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
