Cases 21 - 30 of 4,543
Richey v. Nestle USA, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00173
Plaintiff:
Sandra Richey
Defendant:
Nestle USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Floyd et al v. Aziyo Biologics Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01039
Plaintiff:
Larry D. Floyd and Irma H. Floyd
Defendant:
Aziyo Biologics Inc., Berkeley Biologics LLC, Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Whitfield v. USA
as 5:2024cv00539
Plaintiff:
Stephen Whitfield
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
USA v. Balliett
as 5:2024cv00545
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Shad Balliett
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3545 Action to Recovery Money
McLain et al v. USA
as 3:2024cv00385
Plaintiff:
Brooks McLain and Mohendra Ramroop
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Delerno et al v. Aziyo Biologics Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01026
Plaintiff:
NANCY T. DELERNO and DARRYL DELERNO
Defendant:
Aziyo Biologics Inc., Berkeley Biologics LLC, Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Gonsoulin v. Beta USA, Inc.
as 2:2024cv01005
Plaintiff:
Joseph Michael Gonsoulin and Joseph Gonsoulin
Defendant:
Beta USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Funches v. United States et al
as 1:2024cv00527
Plaintiff:
Cecil Funches
Defendant:
USA, Lt Renae, J Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Long v. Mercedes-Benz USA L L C
as 1:2024cv00330
Plaintiff:
Robert Long
Defendant:
Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC and Mercedes-Benz U S A L L C
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Soto-Martinez v. USA
as 1:2024cv00399
Plaintiff:
Alvaro Luis Soto-Martinez
Defendant:
Warden F C I Pollock and USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
