Cases 21 - 30 of 135
Farrington v.Bergami
as 3:2022cv50250
Petitioner:
Tavares L. Farrington
Respondent:
Warden, USP Coleman I, Thomas Bergami and D. Gonzalez, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Rivera v. United States of America et al
as 1:2022cv03545
Plaintiff:
Jasper Rivera
Defendant:
United States of America, FBOP - USP Thomson and DOJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Baldwin v. Administrative USP Thomson
as 3:2022cv50235
Petitioner:
Reginald Baldwin
Respondent:
Administrative USP Thomson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Gorbey v. Warden, USP Thomson
as 3:2022cv50163
Petitioner:
Michael Gorbey
Respondent:
Warden USP Thomson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Gorbey v. USP Thomson
as 3:2022cv50160
Plaintiff:
Michael Gorbey
Defendant:
USP Thomson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gorbey v. USP Thomson
as 3:2022cv03076
Plaintiff:
Michael Gorbey
Defendant:
USP Thomson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gorbey v. Warden, USP Thomson
as 3:2022cv03075
Petitioner:
Michael Gorbey
Respondent:
Warden, USP Thomson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Oliver v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2022cv01779
Plaintiff:
Arrington Oliver
Defendant:
David Gonzales, Thomas Bergami and Wardens of USP Thomson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Oliver v. Gonzales et al
as 3:2022cv50108
Plaintiff:
Arrington Oliver
Defendant:
David Gonzales, Thomas Bergami and Wardens of USP Thomson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Hyde v. USP Marion et al
as 3:2022cv00334
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey J Hyde
Defendant:
USP Marion and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
