Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Cosby v. Warden ADX, et al
as 22-1407
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GREGORY D. COSBY, AKA Gregory D. Crosby, AKA Gregory D. Cosmo Cosby
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN ADX, WARDEN USP HIGH, COMPLAX AW (PROGRAMS) and others
Cosby v. ADX et al
as 1:2022cv02531
Plaintiff:
Gregory D. Cosby, Gregory D Crosby and Gregory D. Cosmo Cosby
Defendant:
ADX, USP HGH, Complex AW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Team Romeo, et al
as 22-1011
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERIE ADAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN/JANE DOE, Director Western Regional Office of the BOP, JOHN/JANE DOE, Designation Center D.S.C.C. "Team Romeo", MRS. DUBOIS, Unit Manager USP Florence and others
Davis v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2021cv02103
Plaintiff:
Raynard Davis
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, USP Victorville Medical Department, Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marshall v. Health Service Administrators et al
as 1:2021cv01374
Defendant:
USP Lee, USP Coleman I, USP Atwater and others
Plaintiff:
Deric Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aloba v. Avant et al
as 5:2021cv00337
Defendant:
USPS, United States, Warden Grant and others
Plaintiff:
Oriyomi Aloba
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kowalczyk v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2021cv00950
Defendant:
Administrative Remedy Coordinator of Florence FCC/USP, Health Services Dept. of BOP, US Marshal Service and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Kowalczyk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gassew v. USP et al
as 1:2020cv01251
Defendant:
USP and FBOP
Plaintiff:
John Gassew
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sifuentes v. USP Florence et al
as 1:2019cv02419
Defendant:
Stancil, Matavousin and USP Florence
Plaintiff:
Matthew Daniel Sifuentes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Butler v. USP Florence Warden et al
as 1:2019cv01994
Defendant:
USP Florence Warden and Sterrett
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Butler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
