Cases 1 - 10 of 1,212
Bailey v. Warden, FCC Coleman USP 1
as 5:2024cv00197
Petitioner:
Deon Anthony Romell Bailey
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman USP 1
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Glass v. USP Victorville
as 1:2024cv01372
Petitioner:
Donald Glass
Defendant:
USP Victorville
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Schaefer v. Warden, Coleman USP
as 6:2024cv00324
Petitioner:
Jason Paul Schaefer
Respondent:
Warden, Coleman USP and Warden, USP Coleman II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Schaefer v. Warden, Coleman USP
as 5:2024cv00080
Petitioner:
Jason Paul Schaefer
Respondent:
Warden, USP Coleman II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Anderson v. Warden, USP Coleman 2
as 5:2024cv00066
Petitioner:
Denny Ray Anderson
Respondent:
Warden, USP Coleman 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Amos v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
as 5:2024cv00059
Petitioner:
Harold Ray Amos
Defendant:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ulmer v. Warden, USP Coleman II
as 5:2024cv00045
Petitioner:
Jerry Ben Ulmer
Respondent:
Warden, USP Coleman II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Benjamin v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
as 5:2024cv00019
Petitioner:
Johnny C. Benjamin, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Marshall Williams v. FCC Coleman - USP I Warden
as 23-14232
Petitioner:
MARSHALL DEWAYNE WILLIAMS
Respondent:
FCC COLEMAN - USP I WARDEN
Eliel Mata-Arrevalo v. USP Atlanta Warden
as 23-14230
Petitioner:
ELIEL MATA-ARREVALO
Respondent:
USP ATLANTA WARDEN and FCI JESUP WARDEN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
