Cases 51 - 60 of 135
Doctor v. Thomson USP Illinois
as 3:2021cv50117
Petitioner:
Kareem A. Doctor and Kareem Antwan Doctor
Respondent:
Thomson USP illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Fakhouri v. Cioli et al
as 3:2021cv50104
Respondent:
Cioli and USP Thomson Federal Correctional Institution
Petitioner:
Samir Fakhouri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Fakhouri v. Cioli et al
as 1:2021cv01172
Respondent:
Cioli and USP Thomson Federal Correctional Institution
Petitioner:
Samir Fakhouri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Pipps v. Ciolli
as 3:2021cv50080
Respondent:
Federal Bureau Of Prisons, USP Thomson, J. Gilley and others
Petitioner:
Craig Pipps
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Taylor v. Warden At USP Thomson
as 3:2021cv50051
Respondent:
Warden At USP Thomson
Petitioner:
Robert Ebey Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Denault v. Dept of Justice et al
as 3:2021cv00102
Defendant:
D. Sproul, USP Marion, Dept of Justice and others
Plaintiff:
Franklin S. Denault
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jean v. Ciolli
as 3:2021cv50020
Plaintiff:
Johnny Tahja Jean
Defendant:
Warden USP Thomson and Chris Rivers
Respondent:
Andrew Ciolli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bohn v. Blair
as 3:2021cv00029
Defendant:
Lt. Blair and USP Marion
Plaintiff:
Jonathan W. Bohn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Oscar v. USP Thomson
as 3:2021cv50013
Respondent:
USP Thomson
Petitioner:
Jean Oscar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Birkos v. Sykes
as 1:2020cv05325
Plaintiff:
Roksana Birkos
Defendant:
Dominique Sykes Individually and as Agent of United States Postal Service d/b/a USPS Postal Service d/b/a USPS d/b/a Postal Service, Dominique Sykes Individually and as Agent of United States Postal Service doing business as USPS doing business as Postal Service and United States Postal Service individually doing business as USPS doing business as Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
