Cases 81 - 90 of 169
The United States Postal Service ("USPS") Priority Mail Express parcel bearing label number EE195039903US, as described in Attachment A
as 2:2018mj01261
Defendant:
The United States Postal Service ("USPS") Priority Mail Express parcel bearing label number EE195039903US, as described in Attachment A (1)
Plaintiff:
USA
Lorretz et al v. USPS
as 2:2018cv01064
Plaintiff:
Diana Lee Wallach Lorretz and Joel Dennis Wallach
Defendant:
USPS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
In Re: EpiPen Epinephrine Injection USP Marketing, Sales Practices and Antitrust Litigation
as 8:2018mc00003
Plaintiff:
Consumer Class Cases Plaintiffs
In Re:
In Re: EpiPen Epinephrine Injection USP Marketing, Sales Practices and Antitrust Litigation
Movant:
Optumrx, Inc.
Hernandez v. Basch et al
as 4:2018cv00632
Plaintiff:
Bebtsi Reguera Hernandez
Defendant:
David Basch and United States Postal Service (USPS)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
Paige v. USP Canaan et al
as 2:2017cv02594
Plaintiff:
Timothy Wayne Paige
Defendant:
USP Canaan and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillip Figures v. Victorville USP Prison et al
as 5:2017cv00501
Respondent:
Calculated Use of Force Team, Cox, Valero and others
Plaintiff:
Phillip Figures
Travis Ryan Klutts v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2017cv00220
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, National Director Federal Bureau of Prisons, National Director Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Plaintiff:
Travis Ryan Klutts
Figures v. Victorville USP Prison et al
as 3:2017cv00082
Plaintiff:
Phillip P. Figures
Defendant:
Victorville USP Prison, Cox, Valero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christopher Lancaster v. USP Victorville
as 5:2017cv00012
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lancaster
Defendant:
USP Victorville and United States of America
Ayala v. Prinsco, Inc.
as 3:2016cv06250
Defendant:
Prinsco, Inc. , USP Holdings Corporation and Rodrigo Salido
Plaintiff:
Leonard Wayne Ayala
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
