Cases 1 - 7 of 7
SOBIERAJSKI v. AW CHESTERTON COMPANY et al
as 2:2010cv68054
Plaintiff:
BARBARA A SOBIERAJSKI
Defendant:
AW CHESTERTON COMPANY , ASTEN-JOHNSON INC , BSM OPTICAL INC and others
Cross_claimant:
MINERALS TECHNOLOGIES INC.
Cross_defendant:
FOSECO INC, GARLOCK SEALING TECHNOLOGIES LLC, GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MAULDIN et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 2:2010cv61143
Plaintiff:
TIM DAVID MAULDIN and PATTI A MAULDIN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M COMPANY, 3M COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
WEBB v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 2:2010cv61142
Plaintiff:
EUGENE WEBB
Defendant:
3M COMPANY , A W CHESTERTON COMPANY , ALFA LAVAL INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON et al v. AW CHESTERTON COMPANY et al
as 2:2009cv91456
Plaintiff:
JAMES H. JOHNSON and WILLIE R JOHNSON
Defendant:
AW CHESTERTON COMPANY, AW CHESTERTON COMPANY, AW CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Cross Claimant:
MINERALS TECHNOLOGIES INC., MINERALS TECHNOLOGIES INC. and MINERALS TECHNOLOGIES INC.
Cross Defendant:
CBS CORPORATION, FOSECO INC, GARLOCK SEALING TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
SWEET v. A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY et al
as 2:2009cv90821
Plaintiff:
BARBARA A. SWEET
Defendant:
A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, AIRGAS MERCHANT GASES LLC, ASTEN-JOHNSON, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Johnson et al v. AW Chesterton Company et al
as 2:2009cv00059
Plaintiff:
James H Johnson and Willie R Johnson
Defendant:
AW Chesterton Company, Asten-Johnson Inc, BSM Optical Inc and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Sobierajski v. AW Chesterton Company et al
as 2:2008cv00348
Plaintiff:
Thomas Sobierajski
Defendant:
AW Chesterton Company, Asten-Johnson Inc, BSM Optical Inc and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
