Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Health Net, Inc. v. Solvay Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00334
Plaintiff:
Health Net, Inc.
Defendant:
Solvay Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Unimed Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25
Legrand v. Unimed Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv02883
Plaintiff:
George Steven Legrand
Defendant:
Unimed Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Solvay Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25
Fraternal Order of Police et al v. Unimed Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al.
as 1:2009cv02914
Plaintiff:
Fraternal Order of Police, Fraternal Order of Police, Fraternal Order of Police and others
Defendant:
Unimed Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Unimed Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Unimed Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
Type:
Other Statutes
Scurto v. Unimed Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv02915
Plaintiff:
Raymond Scurto, Raymond Scurto, Raymond Scurto and others
Defendant:
Unimed Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Unimed Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Unimed Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
Type:
Other Statutes
Stephen L. LaFrance Pharmacy, Inc. et al v. Unimed Pharmeceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv02913
Plaintiff:
Stephen L. LaFrance Pharmacy, Inc., Stephen L. LaFrance Pharmacy, Inc., Stephen L. LaFrance Holdings, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Unimed Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Unimed Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Solvay Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Type:
Other Statutes
United Food and Commercial Workers Unions and Employers Midwest Health Benefits Fund v. Unimed Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv02848
Plaintiff:
United Food and Commercial Workers Unions and Employers Midwest Health Benefits Fund, United Food and Commercial Workers Unions and Employers Midwest Health Benefits Fund, United Food and Commercial Workers Unions and Employers Midwest Health Benefits Fund and others
Defendant:
Unimed Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Unimed Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Unimed Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
Type:
Other Statutes
Rite Aid Corporation et al v. Unimed Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv02776
Plaintiff:
Rite Aid Corporation, Rite Aid Corporation, Maxi Drug, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Unimed Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Unimed Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Unimed Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
Type:
Other Statutes
IN RE: Androgel Antitrust Litigation (No. II)
as 1:2009md02084
Plaintiff:
George Steven Legrand, Stephen L. LaFrance Holdings, Inc., Maxi Drug, Inc. doing business as Brooks Pharmacy and others
Counter Defendant:
Meijer Inc and Rochester Drug Co-Operative Inc
In Re:
Androgel Antitrust Litigation (No. II)
Defendant:
Unimed Pharmaceuticals Inc, Perrigo Company, Par Pharmaceuticals Inc and others
Respondent:
King Drug Company of Florence, Inc., Miami-Luken, Inc., Prescription Supply, Inc. and others
Counter Claimant:
Paddock Laboratories Inc
Petitioner:
AmerisourceBergen Corp., McKesson Corp., Besins Healthcare, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Louisiana Wholesale Drug Co Inc v. Unimed Pharmaceuticals Inc et al
as 1:2009cv00957
Plaintiff:
Louisiana Wholesale Drug Co Inc
Defendant:
Unimed Pharmaceuticals Inc, Unimed Pharmaceuticals Inc, Unimed Pharmaceuticals Inc and others
Counter Claimant:
Par Pharmaceuticals Inc and Paddock Laboratories Inc
Counter Defendant:
Louisiana Wholesale Drug Co Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Meijer Inc et al v. Unimed Pharmaceuticals Inc et al
as 1:2009cv00958
Counter Defendant:
Meijer Inc
Respondent:
Dik Drug Company, J.M. Smith Corp. d/b/a Smith Drug Company, Miami-Luken, Inc. and others
Petitioner:
Cardinal Health, Inc., AmerisourceBergen Corp., McKesson Corp. and others
Defendant:
Par Pharmaceuticals Inc, Paddock Laboratories Inc, Solvay Pharmaceuticals Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Meijer Distribution Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
