Cases 21 - 30 of 39
Archer v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 1:2015cv00033
Plaintiff:
Charles T. Archer
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 0051
Union Pacific Railroad Company v. CML Metals Corporation
as 2:2014cv00812
Plaintiff:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Defendant:
CML Metals Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martinez v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 2:2014cv00083
Plaintiff:
Calvin Martinez
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hobbs v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 2:2013cv00571
Plaintiff:
Jerry R. Hobbs
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01071
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Employment)
Union Pacific Railroad v. Harsac et al
as 1:2012cv00168
Plaintiff:
Union Pacific Railroad
Defendant:
Harsac and Alan Z. Sachter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wyers v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 2:2011cv01025
Plaintiff:
Rick J. Wyers
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 0051
Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Utah State Tax Commission et al
as 2:2009cv01089
Plaintiff:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Defendant:
Utah State Tax Commission, R. Bruce Johnson and State of Utah
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 11503 Railroad Revitalization Regulatory Reform
Chlorine Institute et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 2:2009cv00574
Plaintiff:
Chlorine Institute and American Chemistry Council
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Union Pacific Railroad v. Modoc Northern Railroad et al
as 1:2009cv00039
Plaintiff:
Union Pacific Railroad
Defendant:
Modoc Northern Railroad and William Donald Blansett
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
