Cases 31 - 40 of 63
Ian McCray v. Unite Here! Local 19
as 5:2016cv01233
Plaintiff:
Ian McCray
Defendant:
Unite Here! Local 19
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Unite Here Local 30 v. Volume Services, Inc.
as 3:2015cv01670
Plaintiff:
Unite Here Local 30
Defendant:
Volume Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 185
Unite Here! Local 30 et al v. High Flying Foods, Inc.
as 3:2015cv01284
Plaintiff:
Unite Here! Local 30 and AFL-CIO
Defendant:
High Flying Foods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
American Hotel and Lodging Association et al v. City of Los Angeles
as 2:2014cv09603
Amicus Curiae:
Western Center on Law and Poverty, Coalition for a Democratic Workplace, Free Speech for People and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Unite Here Local 11
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles
Plaintiff:
American Hotel and Lodging Association and Asian American Hotel Owners Association
Alfonso Martinez Jimenez v. Unite Here Local 11
as 8:2014cv01864
Defendant:
Does and Unite Here Local 11
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Martinez Jimenez
State of California v. Picayune Rancheria of Chukchansi Indians of California
as 1:2014cv01593
Defendant:
Picayune Rancheria of Chukchansi Indians of California
Plaintiff:
State of California
Amicu:
UNITE HERE Local 19
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Unite Here Local 19 v. Picayune Rancheria of Chukchansi Indians et al
as 1:2014cv01136
Plaintiff:
Unite Here Local 19
Defendant:
Picayune Rancheria of Chukchansi Indians and Chukchansi Economic Development Authority
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Unite Here Local 49 v. Khan
as 2:2013cv01985
Plaintiff:
Unite Here Local 49
Defendant:
Dam Khan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Unite Here Local 49 v. Khan
as 2:2013at01099
Plaintiff:
Unite Here Local 49
Defendant:
Dam Khan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Volume Services, Inc. v. Unite Here, Local 2
as 4:2013cv02318
Plaintiff:
Volume Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Unite Here, Local 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
