Cases 11 - 20 of 595
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00546
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Stephens v. United Parcel Service Inc.
as 3:2024cv00500
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Stephens
Defendant:
United Parcel Service Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Batieste v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00473
Plaintiff:
Dante Batieste
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00175
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024at00090
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Airoldi v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00429
Plaintiff:
Mike Airoldi
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00306
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Cazarez v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00376
Plaintiff:
Adolfo Cazarez
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Benter v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00375
Plaintiff:
Samuel Benter
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Destiny Patino et al v. United Parcel Service Inc. et al
as 8:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
Destiny Patino and Kelvin Melo
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc., Rudy Gonzalez, United Parcel Service Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
