Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 11 - 20 of 98
TAYLOR et al v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
as 2:2022cv03670
Plaintiff: RHONDA TAYLOR and TONYA ANDERSON
Defendant: UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 27 U.S.C. § 185 Enforcement of Arbitration Award
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv03431
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02975
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv02545
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
CERRATO v. BOWMAN et al
as 2:2022cv02349
Plaintiff: MICHELLE CERRATO
Defendant: JOHN BOWMAN and UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
PEELE v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC. (UPS) et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv01835
Plaintiff: MARCUS J. PEELE
Defendant: UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC. (UPS) and LOCAL 623 UNION INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS (IBT)
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00334
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
BINGHAM v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
as 2:2022cv00470
Plaintiff: RHONDA BINGHAM
Defendant: UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv05166
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01902
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?