Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Cases 41 - 50 of 57
United States ex rel Kurt Bunk v. Gosselin World Wide Moving We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-1369
Plaintiff - Appellant: UNITED STATES EX REL KURT BUNK and UNITED STATES EX REL RAY AMMONS
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES EX REL DANIEL HEUSER
Defendant - Appellee: GOSSELIN WORLD WIDE MOVING, N.V., VIKTORIA INTERNATIONAL SPEDITION, GOSSELIN WORLD WIDE MOVING GMBH and others
Defendant: BIRKART GLOBISTICS GMBH & CO. LOGISTIK UND SERVICE KG, THE PASHA GROUP, ITO MOBEL TRANSPORT GMBH and others
:
United States ex rel Kurt Bunk v. Gosselin World Wide Moving
as 12-1369
Plaintiff / Appellant: UNITED STATES EX REL KURT BUNK and UNITED STATES EX REL RAY AMMONS
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES EX REL DANIEL HEUSER
Not Yet Classified: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellee: GOSSELIN WORLD WIDE MOVING, N.V., GOSSELIN GROUP N.V. and MARC SMET
Defendant: BIRKART GLOBISTICS GMBH & CO. LOGISTIK UND SERVICE KG, THE PASHA GROUP, ITO MOBEL TRANSPORT GMBH and others
Amicus Curiae: TAXPAYERS AGAINST FRAUD EDUCATION FUND, CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND MANUFACTURERS OF AMERICA
United States ex rel. Carter v. Halliburton Company We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-1011
Plaintiff - Appellant: UNITED STATES EX REL. BENJAMIN CARTER
Defendant - Appellee: HALLIBURTON COMPANY, KELLOGG BROWN & ROOT SERVICES, INCORPORATED, SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL INCORPORATED and others
:
US ex rel. Noah Nathan v. Takeda Pharmaceutical We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-2077
Plaintiff - Appellant: UNITED STATES EX REL. NOAH NATHAN
Defendant - Appellee: TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS NORTH AMERICA, INCORPORATED and TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS AMERICA, INCORPORATED
: , , and others
US ex rel. Debra Parks v. Alpharma, Incorporated We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-1498
Plaintiff - Appellant: UNITED STATES EX REL. DEBRA PARKS
Plaintiff: CALIFORNIA, DELAWARE, FLORIDA and others
Defendant - Appellee: ALPHARMA, INCORPORATED, ALPHARMA BRANDED PRODUCTS DIVISION, INCORPORATED, FAULDING LABORATORIES and others
Defendant: SEALED DEFENDANT # 5, SEALED DEFENDANT #6, SEALED DEFENDANT #7 and others
:
US ex rel. Joseph M. Russell v. Michael Gennari
as 11-1329
Plaintiff - Appellant: UNITED STATES EX REL. JOSEPH M. RUSSELL
Defendant - Appellee: MICHAEL GENNARI, Ph.D., EVONNE FEI and NANCY LYNNE RUSSELL
Party-in-Interest: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
US ex rel. Jon H. Oberg v. Kentucky Higher Ed., et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-2320
Plaintiff - Appellant: UNITED STATES EX REL. JON H. OBERG
Defendant - Appellee: KENTUCKY HIGHER EDUCATION STUDENT LOAN CORP., PENNSYLVANIA HIGHER EDUCATION ASSISTANCE AGENCY, VERMONT STUDENT ASSISTANCE CORPORATION and others
Defendant: NELNET, INC., SLM CORPORATION, PANHANDLE PLAINS HIGHER EDUCATION AUTHORITY and others
:
Matthew Young v. Scepter Corporation
as 10-1241
Plaintiff - Appellant: MATTHEW D. YOUNG, United States ex rel, DAVID A. YOUNG and DAVIDSON PRODUCTS & SERVICES LLC
Defendant - Appellee: SCEPTER CORPORATION
Party-in-Interest - None: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Thomas Ubl v. IIF Data Solutions We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-2280
Plaintiff - Appellant: THOMAS M. UBL, United States ex rel
Defendant - Appellee: IIF DATA SOLUTIONS and CHARLES PATTEN, SR.
Party-in-Interest - None: UNITED STATES GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
United States ex rel. Peter C. v. Bald Head Island Limited We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-1931
Plaintiff - Appellant: UNITED STATES EX REL. PETER C. CURNIN
Defendant - Appellee: BALD HEAD ISLAND LIMITED, a Texas limited partnership, MARK D. MITCHELL, general partner and MICHAEL K. MITCHELL, general partner
:

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?