Cases 41 - 50 of 113
C De Baca v. Perdue, et al.
as 1:2017cv01161
Plaintiff:
Catherine C De Baca
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Hasara et al v. United States of America et al
as 6:2017cv01290
Plaintiff:
Devone Hasara and Gregory Cordes
Defendant:
United States of America, US Probation Office and Eric Towner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Fredrickson v. Tollette et al
as 6:2017cv00111
Plaintiff:
Susan Fredrickson
Defendant:
Dan Tollette and United States Department Agriculture Rural Development
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lente et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2017cv00181
Plaintiff:
Wilmer Lente and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Defendant:
United States of America and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. United States of America et al
as 4:2016cv00592
Plaintiff:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Defendant:
United States of America and Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Adams v. United States of America
as 1:2016cv00963
Plaintiff:
Robert E Adams
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Montgomery v. Hoffman Heights U.S. Post Office
as 1:2016cv01486
Plaintiff:
Tamara Montgomery
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2679
Mai Mechanical Corporation v. United States Postal Service et al
as 1:2016cv00419
Plaintiff:
Mai Mechanical Corporation
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, Mark Talbott, Christina M. Paulson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Shams v. United States Postal Service
as 2:2015cv00197
Plaintiff:
Ziaush Shams
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Micke v. United States of America
as 2:2015cv00171
Plaintiff:
Keith Micke
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
