Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Jacoby v. United States Veteran's Admin. et al
as 1:2016cv05714
Plaintiff:
Mark Jacoby
Defendant:
United States Veteran's Admin. , US Attorney General and U.S Attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tommy Howard v. DVA, et al
as 15-3301
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TOMMY W. HOWARD
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS and BOARD OF VETERAN APPEALS
IN THE MATTER OF THE SUPERVISED ESTATE OF JULIA THIEL, DECEASED v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
as 3:2014cv00086
Plaintiff:
IN THE MATTER OF THE SUPERVISED ESTATE OF JULIA THIEL, DECEASED
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Recovery of VA Overpayment
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JONES
as 1:2009cv00134
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MANDY JO JONES
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. THOMAS
as 1:2008cv01330
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
KAREN THOMAS
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SMITH
as 1:2008cv01096
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DERRICK H. SMITH
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
United States of America v. Kuykendall
as 2:2008cv00045
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Delphenia Kuykendall
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 3116 VA Overpayment
United States of America v. Anderson
as 4:2007cv00042
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Martha J Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Recovery of VA Overpayment
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. GEORGE
as 1:2007cv00934
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JERRY DEAN GEORGE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Recovery of VA Overpayment
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MORRIS
as 1:2007cv00930
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MONROE MORRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Medical Care Recovery
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
