Cases 1 - 10 of 42
TN v. Xavier Becerra, et al
as 24-5220
Plaintiff:
STATE OF TENNESSEE
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA, in his official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, JESSICA S. MARCELLA, in her official capacity as Deputy Assistant Secretary for Population Affairs and others
American College of Pediatricians, et al v. Xavier Becerra, et al
as 23-5053
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AMERICAN COLLEGE OF PEDIATRICIANS, on behalf of its members and CATHOLIC MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, on behalf of its members
Defendant / Appellee:
XAVIER BECERRA, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, OFFICE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS OF THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Livingston Educational Service Agency, et al v. Xavier Becerra, et al
as 22-1257
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LIVINGSTON EDUCATIONAL SERVICE AGENCY and WAYNE-WESTLAND COMMUNITY SCHOOLS
Defendant / Appellee:
XAVIER BECERRA, in his official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, JOO YEUN CHANG, in her official capacity as Assistant Secretary and Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Administration for Children and Families and others
John Thumann v. Xavier Becerra
as 21-3502
Defendant / Appellee:
XAVIER BECERRA, in his capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN THUMANN
Tiger Lily, LLC, et al v. HUD, et al
as 21-5256
Defendant / Appellant:
CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION, MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General, In his official capacity as United States Attorney General, MARCIA FUDGE, In her official capacity as United States Secretary of Housing and Urban Development and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BRITTANY RAILEY, NORTH 22ND FLAT, LLC, CHERRY HILL GARDENS, LLC and others
Vapor Technology Association, et al v. FDA, et al
as 20-5199
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VAPOR STOCKROOM, LLC
Plaintiff:
VAPOR TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATION
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, NORMAN E. SHARPLESS, M.D., Acting Commissioner for Food and Drug Administration and others
1701 Express, INC v. HHS, et al
as 20-3155
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Petitioner:
1701 EXPRESS, INC, dba Citgo
Melissa Buck, et al v. Robert Gordon, et al
as 19-2185
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MELISSA BUCK, CHAD BUCK, ST. VINCENT CATHOLIC CHARITIES and others
Defendant / Appellant:
ROBERT GORDON, in his official capacity as Director of the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services, JOO YEUN CHANG, in his official capacity as the Executive Director of the Michigan Children's Services Agency, DANA NESSEL, in her official capacity as Attorney General of Michigan and others
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II, in his official capacity as the Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Not Yet Classified:
DANA DUMONT and KRISTY DUMONT
Melissa Buck, et al v. Robert Gordon, et al
as 19-1959
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MELISSA BUCK, CHAD BUCK, ST. VINCENT CATHOLIC CHARITIES and others
Defendant:
ALEX AZAR, in his official capacity as the Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, DANA NESSEL, in her official capacity as Attorney General of Michigan, ROBERT GORDON, in his official capacity as Director of the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services and others
Not Yet Classified:
DANA DUMONT and KRISTY DUMONT
Golden Living Center-Mountain v. HHS, et al
as 19-3755
Petitioner:
GOLDEN LIVING CENTER-MOUNTAIN VIEW
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
