Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Huffine v. Sherrod et al
as 1:2007cv00965
Plaintiff:
Eldon Huffine
Defendant:
A. W. Sherrod, United States Department of Justice and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grandinetti v. USA et al
as 1:2007cv00895
Plaintiff:
Francis A. Grandinetti, II
Defendant:
USA, United States Department of Justice, District of Hawaii and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 1:2007cv00857
Plaintiff:
Timothy Doyle Young
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice, Alberto Gonzales, Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kouris v. 21st Judicial District Court
as 1:2007cv00772
Plaintiff:
Vincent George Kouris
Defendant:
Richard Thomas Gurley, Amanda Bailey, Pete Hatzinger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Valdez v. Marshal
as 1:2007cv00740
Plaintiff:
Richard Valdez
Defendant:
Julie Marshal, Fremont County District Courts, Colorado Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chavez v. Cohen et al
as 1:2007cv00583
Plaintiff:
Steven Lopez Chavez
Defendant:
Kenneth P. Cohen, Hays, Susan Knox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Graham v. Rutledge
as 1:2007cv00433
Plaintiff:
Paul Graham
Defendant:
James Glenn Rutledge, Denver Police Dept., Dan Whitman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pernesky v. United States Department of Justice
as 1:2007cv00411
Plaintiff:
Scott W. Pernesky
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hopes v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 1:2007mc00023
Petitioner:
Robert Charles Hopes, Jr.
Respondent:
United States Department of Justice and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
