Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Rowe v. Ford
as 19-1815
Defendant / Appellee:
Richard B. McNamara, Kristin Spath, Judge, Christopher Keating and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Leonard Wyatt Rowe, III
Rowe v. Ford
as 19-1804
Defendant / Appellee:
Richard B. McNamara, Kristin Spath, Judge, Christopher Keating and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Leonard Wyatt Rowe, III
McCray v. County of Dutchess
as 17-1781
Plaintiff:
Gabrielle Lutterodt, Patrick Lebon, Mindu Allah and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Cerious McCray
Defendant - Appellee:
Patrolman N.A. Caparco
Defendant:
Dutchess County, Village of Wappingers Falls, Police Department, Chief of Police John Doe and others
Abreu v. United States of America
as 12-2466
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Carlos Abreu
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America, State of New York, New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision and others
Abreu v. United States of America
as 12-2466
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Carlos Abreu
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America, State of New York, New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision and others
Auleta v. Sullivan
as 11-4411
Petitioner:
Francis Auleta, a practicing Shaman, AKA Ravenhawk, AKA Blackhawk
Respondent:
Valerie Sullivan, Deputy Superintendent of Programs, Lawrence Lucas, Coordinating Chaplain, Toni E. Logue, an Assistant Attorney General, solely in her Individual Capacity and others
Auleta v. Sullivan
as 11-573
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Francis Auleta, a practicing Shaman, AKA Ravenhawk, AKA Blackhawk
Defendant - Appellee:
Valerie Sullivan, Deputy Superintendent of Programs, Lawrence Lucas, Coordinating Chaplain, Toni E. Logue, an Assistant Attorney General, solely in her Individual Capacity and others
Auleta v. Sullivan et al
as 6:2011cv06022
Plaintiff:
Francis Auleta
Defendant:
Valerie Sullivan, Lawrence Lucas, Doe or Does, Central Office Review Committee Members and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
