Cases 1 - 7 of 7
SIMS et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2021cv01120
Defendant:
UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, CHARLES P. RETTIG, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Plaintiff:
MARCIA BROWN and SHERRY L SIMS
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
KOTHAPALLI v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, BUREAU OF FISCAL SERVICE
as 2:2017cv13168
Plaintiff:
SIRISHA KOTHAPALLI
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, BUREAU OF FISCAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
KOTHAPALLI v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, BUREAU OF FISCAL SERVICE
as 3:2017cv13168
Plaintiff:
SIRISHA KOTHAPALLI
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, BUREAU OF FISCAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
UBS FINANCIAL SERVICES INC. et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2017cv03280
Plaintiff:
UBS FINANCIAL SERVICES INC. and UBS BANK USA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY and INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7426 IRS: Wrongful Levy for Taxes
BANNER LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. THE ESTATE OF LEONARD M. SCHNEIDER et al
as 2:2012cv04555
Plaintiff:
BANNER LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
THE ESTATE OF LEONARD M. SCHNEIDER, ANNA WISZYNSKI, RANDY J. SCHNEIDER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1340
WILLIAMS v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEWARK, NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2011cv00884
Plaintiff:
CAZZIE L. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEWARK, NEW JERSEY, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FIRST CHOICE BANK v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY - INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE et al
as 3:2010cv03415
Plaintiff:
FIRST CHOICE BANK
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY - INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE , UB HOLDING L.L.C., STEPHEN VITA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
