Cases 31 - 40 of 45
Islam v. Porter et al
as 1:2013cv01644
Plaintiff:
MD. S. Islam
Defendant:
LLoyd Porter and United States Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
City of Santa Ana v. United States Government et al
as 8:2012cv02234
Plaintiff:
City of Santa Ana
Defendant:
Department of the Treasury and Internal Revenue Service, Does, James B Hansen and others
Espinosa v. United States Government et al
as 8:2012cv02818
Plaintiff:
Manuel E. Espinosa
Defendant:
United States Government, Commonwealth of Kentucky and Louisville Metro Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Auto Negligence
City of Santa Ana v. United States Government et al
as 8:2012cv01765
Plaintiff:
City of Santa Ana
Defendant:
Department of the Treasury and Internal Revenue Service, Does, James B Hansen and others
Woulfe v. United States Government
as 3:2012cv02122
Plaintiff:
Richard Woulfe
Defendant:
United States Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
BROWN v. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
as 1:2012cv00588
Plaintiff:
KENNETH BROWN, JR.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Moody v. Deschamp et al
as 3:2011cv00835
Defendant:
Bernie Deschamp and United States Government
Plaintiff:
Nun Cha Moody
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Moran vs. United States Government
as 1:2011cv06916
Plaintiff:
Armida Moran
Defendant:
United States Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
Williams v. The United States Government et al
as 1:2011cv00933
Plaintiff:
Edward Williams
Defendant:
The United States Government, The United States Of America and The Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2401
Simmons v. United States Government Agency et al
as 2:2010cv04177
Plaintiff:
Deirdre O Simmons
Defendant:
United States Government Agency, William I Bobo, III and Unidentified Party
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2401
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
