Cases filed in Mississippi
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Commissioning & Green Building Solutions, Inc. v. Pontchartrain Partners LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00032
Plaintiff: United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Commissioning & Green Building Solutions, Inc.
Defendant: Pontchartrain Partners LLC and Western Surety Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 bc Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Consolidated Electrical Distributors, Inc. v. S/W Electrical, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00194
Plaintiff: United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Consolidated Electrical Distributors, Inc.
Defendant: S/W Electrical, LLC, Suretech Insurance Company, United States Fire Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Coburn Supply Co., Inc. v. MSN Construction, LLC et al
as 3:2021cv00101
Defendant: MSN Construction, LLC, Nilesh Patel, North American Specialty Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff: United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Coburn Supply Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Vulcan Construction Materials, LLC v. ECW Recoveries, LLC et al
as 2:2020cv00097
Defendant: ECW Recoveries, LLC, The Gray Insurance Company and Michael Shae Easterling
Plaintiff: United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Vulcan Construction Materials, LLC
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Type: Contract Miller Act
The United States of America For the use and benefit of Whitesell-Green, Inc. v. Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America
as 3:2019cv00171
Plaintiff: The United States of America For the use and benefit of Whitesell-Green, Inc.
Defendant: Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Type: Contract Miller Act
The United States of America for the use and benefit of The Clement Group, LLC v. ETD-TCG, LLC et al
as 3:2016cv00570
Plaintiff: The United States of America for the use and benefit of The Clement Group, LLC
Defendant: ETD-TCG, LLC and Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
The United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Bagby & Russell Electric Company, Inc. v. Satterfield & Pontikes Construction, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00150
Plaintiff: The United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Bagby & Russell Electric Company, Inc.
Defendant: Satterfield & Pontikes Construction, Inc. , Western Surety Company and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America, For the Use and Benefit of APAC-Mississippi, Inc. v. Federal Insurance Company
as 1:2012cv00264
Plaintiff: United States of America, For the Use and Benefit of APAC-Mississippi, Inc.
Defendant: Federal Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America for the use and benefit of Ready Mix USA, L.L.C. v. One Stop Environmental, L.L.C. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv00144
Plaintiff: United States of America for the use and benefit of Ready Mix USA, L.L.C.
Defendant: One Stop Environmental, L.L.C. , Simpson Plastering, L.L.C. and American Safety Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America for the use and benefit of Rea's Country Lane Construction, Inc. v. Tropical World Landscape and Irrigation, LLC. et al
as 4:2012cv00005
Plaintiff: United States of America for the use and benefit of Rea's Country Lane Construction, Inc.
Defendant: Travelers Casualty & Surety Company of America and Tropical World Landscape & Irrigation, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Type: Contract Miller Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?