Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Naomi Estrada-Mendoza et al v. United States of America Department of Veterans Affairs et al
as 5:2023cv00306
Plaintiff:
Naomi Estrada-Mendoza, Noel Christine Estrada-Loud, Juventino Mendoza and others
Defendant:
United States of America Department of Veterans Affairs, Loma Linda University Health, Pedro A. De Andrade Filho and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402 Medical Malpractice
Carlos L. Lopez, Sr. et al v. The United States of America, Department of Veterans Affairs et al
as 2:2021cv10036
Plaintiff:
CARLOS L. LOPEZ, SR. and JUANITA S. LOPEZ
Defendant:
M.D. CHRISTINE HOLLAND, M.D. ROBERT CHONG, The United States of America, Department of Veterans Affairs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
Kearney v. United States of America Department of Veterans Affairs
as 2:2017cv01767
Defendant:
United States of America Department of Veterans Affairs
Plaintiff:
Dennis Kearney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Alonzo J Foster v. United States of America Department of Veterans Affairs et al
as 2:2012cv10750
Defendant:
Brotman Medical Center, Spencer L Brown, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Alonzo J Foster
Dobbs v. United States of America Department of Veterans Affairs et al
as 1:2011cv00530
Defendant:
United States of America Department of Veterans Affairs-Veterans Administration and Nagabhushana S Malakkla
Plaintiff:
Joseph Dobbs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Marsili v. United States of America Department of Veteran's Affairs
as 3:2010cv01164
Plaintiff:
Robert Marsili
Defendant:
United States of America Department of Veteran's Affairs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Marsili v. United States of America Department of Veteran's Affairs
as 5:2010cv01164
Plaintiff:
Robert Marsili
Defendant:
United States of America Department of Veteran's Affairs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
