Cases 1 - 5 of 5
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO/CLC v. Ameron Pole Products LLC
as 2:2024cv01212
Plaintiff:
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO/CLC
Defendant:
Ameron Pole Products LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Tesoro Refining and Marketing Company LLC v. United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied-Industrial and Service Workers International Union, A.F.L.-C.I.O. Local 675
as 2:2019cv08853
Plaintiff:
Tesoro Refining & Marketing Company LLC and Tesoro Refining and Marketing Company LLC
Defendant:
UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER, MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED-INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, A.F.L.-C.I.O. LOCAL 675
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO, CLC v. Vista Metals Corporation
as 5:2019cv01781
Defendant:
Vista Metals Corporation
Plaintiff:
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO, CLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Juan Gutierrez et al v. Evans Dedicated Systems, Inc. et al
as 8:2017cv01459
Plaintiff:
Martin Anderson, Jr., John Christiansen, Robert Coleman and others
Defendant:
William H Culbertson, Does, Evans Dedicated Systems, Inc. and others
United Steel, Paper and Forestry v. Craford & Craford et al
as 3:2014cv01959
Plaintiff:
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union
Defendant:
Craford & Craford and Michael D Craford
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
