Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Tucker v. Unitrin Auto and Home Insurance Company
as 2:2023cv05292
Plaintiff:
George Tucker
Defendant:
Unitrin Auto and Home Insurance Company
Interested Party:
Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Mathies et al v. Unitrin Auto and Home Insurance Company
as 3:2023cv01256
Plaintiff:
David Mathies and Marie Mathies
Defendant:
Unitrin Auto and Home Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Harper et al v. Unitrin Auto and Home Insurance Co
as 1:2018cv01321
Plaintiff:
Judith Harper and Kenneth Harper
Defendant:
Unitrin Auto and Home Insurance Company and Unitrin Auto & Home Insurance Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wesley v. Unitrin Auto and Home Insurance Company et al
as 2:2012cv02311
Plaintiff:
Wendy Wesley
Defendant:
US Agencies Insurance Company, Andrew Cappo, Reynalda Cochran and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
King v. Becker et al
as 3:2012cv00455
Defendant:
Herbert Becker and Unitrin Auto and Home Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Barbara King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Tucker v. Unitrin Auto and Home Insurance Company
as 2:2011cv00324
Plaintiff:
George Tucker
Defendant:
Unitrin Auto and Home Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Denny v. Parker, et al
as 3:2009cv00256
Plaintiff:
Dionna Denny
Defendant:
Randy Parker, Geico General Insurance Company and Unitrin Auto and Home Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Jones et al v. Unitrin Auto and Home Insurance Company
as 2:2007cv08600
Plaintiff:
Kim R. Jones, Kim R. Jones, Christian P. Jones and others
Defendant:
Unitrin Auto and Home Insurance Company and Unitrin Auto and Home Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
