Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Kentucky Mist Moonshine Inc. v. University of Kentucky
as 5:2015cv00385
Plaintiff:
Kentucky Mist Moonshine Inc.
Defendant:
University of Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kentucky Mist Moonshine Inc. v. University of Kentucky
as 5:2015cv00328
Plaintiff:
Kentucky Mist Moonshine Inc.
Defendant:
University of Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
David Coyle v. University of Kentucky, et al
as 14-5401
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID COYLE, individually and doing business as Team Coyle Photography
Defendant - Appellee:
UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY, UNIVERSITY ATHLETICS COMMITTEE OF THE UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY BOARD OF TRUSTEES, as successor in interest to the University of Kentucky Athletics Association, ERIC N. MONDAY, individually and in his capacity as Executive Vice President for Finance and Administration of the University of Kentucky and others
Defendant:
PAUL MILLER FORD, INC., UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, HANDS ON ORIGINALS, INC. and others
University of Kentucky Research Foundation, Inc. v. Niadyne, Inc.
as 3:2013cv00016
Plaintiff:
University of Kentucky Research Foundation, Inc.
Defendant:
Niadyne, Inc.
Counter_claimant:
Niadyne, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
University of Kentucky Research Foundation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Coyle v. University of Kentucky et al
as 5:2012cv00369
Plaintiff:
David Coyle
Defendant:
University of Kentucky , University Athletics Committee of the University of Kentucky Board of Trustees , Paul Miller Ford, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
BAYER HEALTHCARE LLC et al v. WEDGEWOOD VILLAGE PHARMACY, INC.
as 1:2009cv05345
Plaintiff:
BAYER HEALTHCARE LLC, UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY RESEARCH FOUNDATION and NEW ACE RESEARCH COMPANY
Defendant:
WEDGEWOOD VILLAGE PHARMACY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
