Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Castelline v. The Paul Rever Life Insurance Company et al
as 3:2010cv00793
Plaintiff:
Peter Castelline
Defendant:
The Paul Rever Life Insurance Company and UNUM Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Burdette v. Paul Revere Life Insurance Company et al
as 1:2010cv00487
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Burdette, M.D.
Defendant:
Paul Revere Life Insurance Company and UNUM Group Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Eppley v. UNUM Group
as 1:2009cv01736
Plaintiff:
Stephen G. Eppley
Defendant:
UNUM Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Sorace v. UNUM Group, Inc.
as 3:2009cv01056
Plaintiff:
Wendy Sorace
Defendant:
UNUM Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
PLAZA-PONTE v. PROVIDENT LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2009cv00004
Plaintiff:
MARIO PLAZA-PONTE, M.D.
Defendant:
PROVIDENT LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY and UNUM GROUP
Cause Of Action: Diversity
IZZO v. UNUM GROUP CORPORATION
as 2:2008cv01504
Plaintiff:
LARRY IZZO
Defendant:
UNUM GROUP CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
LACOUTURE et al v. WEST PENN ALLEGHENY HEALTH SYSTEM, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv01292
Plaintiff:
DAWNA L. LACOUTURE, DAWNA L. LACOUTURE, DAWNA L. LACOUTURE and others
Defendant:
WEST PENN ALLEGHENY HEALTH SYSTEM, INC., THE WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA HEALTHCARE SYSTEM INTEGRATED DELIVERY CORPORATION and UNUM GROUP CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MOIDEL v. UNUM GROUP
as 2:2008cv00344
Plaintiff:
EDWARD C. MOIDEL
Defendant:
UNUM GROUP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
MARSICO v. THE UNUM GROUP et al
as 2:2007cv01482
Plaintiff:
LOUIS S. MARSICO
Defendant:
THE UNUM GROUP, UNUMPROVIDENT CORPORATION, PROVIDENT LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
