Cases 1 - 10 of 20
USA v. Tyrik Upchurch
as 20-3189
Defendant / Appellant:
TYRIK UPCHURCH, aka RED aka REDS aka REEKY
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plumley v. Mobile Mini, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00528
Defendant:
Sara R. Dial, Michael W. Upchurch, James J. Martell and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick Plumley
Stein v. Mobile Mini, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00523
Defendant:
Sara R. Dial, Michael W. Upchurch, James J. Martell and others
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. UPCHURCH
as 2:2011cv02985
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ANTHONY UPCHURCH
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
ZHANG v. CHERTOFF et al
as 2:2009cv00059
Plaintiff:
ZHIYOU ZHANG
Defendant:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, JONATHAN SCHARFEN, EVELYN UPCHURCH and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Edith Newcomber v. Amer Inv Life Ins Co
as 08-3511
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDITH NEWCOMBER and JONATHAN E. UPCHURCH
Defendant - Appellee:
AMER INV LIFE INS CO, AMERUS GRP CO and AMERUS ANNUITY GRP CO
USMAN v. UPCHURCH et al
as 2:2008cv01443
Plaintiff:
MOHAMMED HARIS UMER USMAN
Defendant:
EVELYN UPCHURCH, MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, ROBERT S. MUELLER, III and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
SAEED et al v. CHERTOFF et al
as 2:2008cv01294
Plaintiff:
TAHIR SAEED, NAILA SAEED and DANYALL SAEED
Defendant:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO T. GONZALEZ, MICHAEL L. AYTES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
ZELAZO v. CHERTOFF et al
as 5:2008cv01183
Plaintiff:
MALGORZATA ZELAZO
Defendant:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO T. GONZALEZ, EVELYN UPCHURCH and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
SHEN et al v. CHERTOFF et al
as 2:2008cv01014
Plaintiff:
QING SHEN, WEN FENG SUN and ZI XUAN SHEN
Defendant:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO T. GONZALEZ, EVELYN UPCHURCH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
