Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Van Pelt v. Uraski et al
as 3:2023cv02089
Plaintiff:
Ronald M Van Pelt
Defendant:
Jon M. Uraski, Charles W. Heck and Bradley A. Kirkman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Van Pelt v. Uraski et al
as 3:2023cv01656
Plaintiff:
Ronald M. Van Pelt
Defendant:
Jon M. Uraski, Charles W. Heck, Bradley A. Kirkman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Van Pelt v. Pinckneyville Correctional Center et al
as 3:2022cv02539
Plaintiff:
Ronald M. Van Pelt
Defendant:
Pinckneyville Correctional Center, M. Myers, B. Kirkman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Van Pelt v. Mitchell
as 2:2022cv02097
Petitioner:
Ronald M Van Pelt
Respondent:
David Mitchell
Not Classified By Court:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Van Pelt v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2021pq00608
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Chevron U.S.A. Inc., Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Scott Cramer Van Pelt
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Peters v. Rauner et al
as 3:2020cv00689
Defendant:
Dr. Pofeat, Mary Wilson, Jacqueline Lashbrook and others
Plaintiff:
Scott Peters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ackley et al v. Yes To, Inc.
as 1:2020cv01823
Plaintiff:
Ackley, Tammy Gerkin, Crystal Benefiel and others
Defendant:
Yes To, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Van Pelt v. Uraski et al
as 3:2018cv01273
Plaintiff:
Ronald M. Van Pelt
Defendant:
C/O Uraski, Major Malcom, C/O Shurtz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Van Pelt v. Doe et al
as 3:2018cv00423
Defendant:
John Doe and Warden of Menard Correctional Center
Plaintiff:
Ronald M. Van Pelt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Van Pelt v. Butler et al
as 3:2017cv01226
Plaintiff:
Ronald M. Van Pelt
Defendant:
Kimberly Butler, Cameron Watson, K. Bridges and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
