Cases 1 - 7 of 7
ALLEN et al v. CELLCO PARTNERSHIP et al
as 3:2023cv01138
Plaintiff:
PAMELA M ALLEN, LISA BAKER, BRIANA BELL and others
Defendant:
CELLCO PARTNERSHIP (DBA VERIZON WIRELESS), VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC., CELLCO PARTNERSHIP doing business as VERIZON WIRELESS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
CORSI et al v. CELLCO PARTNERSHIP et al
as 3:2022cv04621
Plaintiff:
CINTIA CORSI, KARYN CHALLENDER, ANGELA GREEN and others
Defendant:
CELLCO PARTNERSHIP D/B/A VERIZON WIRELESS, VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC. and CELLCO PARTNERSHIP doing business as VERIZON WIRELESS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
CORSI et al v. CELLCO PARTNERSHIP D/B/A VERIZON WIRELESS et al
as 2:2022cv04621
Plaintiff:
CINTIA CORSI, KARYN CHALLENDER, ANGELA GREEN and others
Defendant:
CELLCO PARTNERSHIP D/B/A VERIZON WIRELESS and VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
ACHEY et al v. CELLCO PARTNERSHIP et al
as 3:2022cv00752
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY ACHEY, MARILYN ACHEY, JUSTIN ANDERSON and others
Defendant:
CELLCO PARTNERSHIP (DBA VERIZON WIRELESS), VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. and CELLCO PARTNERSHIP doing business as VERIZON WIRELESS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Contract Dispute
LELAJ v. VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. et al
as 1:2016cv05209
Plaintiff:
ARETI LELAJ
Defendant:
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. and JOHN DOES 1-5 AND 6-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Fraud
JOAQUIN v. DIRECTV GROUP HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 3:2015cv08194
Plaintiff:
ANGELA JOAQUIN
Defendant:
INSTALLATION COMPANY 1-10, WAYNE D. LONSTEIN, STEVEN LEVINE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
In Touch Concepts, Inc. v. Verizon Communications Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00542
Plaintiff:
IN TOUCH CONCEPTS, INC.
Defendant:
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. , CELLCO PARTNERSHIP , VODAFONE GROUP PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
