Cases 21 - 30 of 65
JOAQUIN v. DIRECTV GROUP HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 3:2015cv08194
Plaintiff:
ANGELA JOAQUIN
Defendant:
INSTALLATION COMPANY 1-10, WAYNE D. LONSTEIN, STEVEN LEVINE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv21442
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv18129
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv18128
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
ALLEN v. VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC. et al
as 3:2018cv08918
Defendant:
CELLCO PARTNERSHIP and VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
Plaintiff:
BRANDY A. ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
SIGHTSEER ENTERPRISE, INC. v. VERIZON NEW JERSEY INC, et al
as 3:2018cv16122
Defendant:
VERIZON NEW JERSEY INC, and VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC
Plaintiff:
SIGHTSEER ENTERPRISE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 251
ALLEN v. VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv08918
Plaintiff:
BRANDY A. ALLEN
Defendant:
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC. and CELLCO PARTNERSHIP (DBA VERIZON WIRELESS)
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
VOUTHAS et al v. VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC. et al
as 3:2017cv01038
Plaintiff:
DIMITRIOS VOUTHAS and JACKLYN K. VOUTHAS
Defendant:
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC. , CHRISTOPHER BARKER , CHRISTOPHER MORZ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
JUPIN et al v. ASPLUNDH TREE EXPERT COMPANY et al
as 1:2016cv09361
Plaintiff:
MARK JUPIN and LISA ELWELL-JUPIN
Defendant:
ASPLUNDH TREE EXPERT COMPANY, ASPLUNDH TREE EXPERT CO. , ASPLUNDH TREE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
LELAJ v. VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. et al
as 1:2016cv05209
Plaintiff:
ARETI LELAJ
Defendant:
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. and JOHN DOES 1-5 AND 6-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
