Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Verizon Delaware Inc. et al v. American PCS Communications LLC et al
as 1:2008cv00192
Plaintiff:
Verizon Delaware Inc., Verizon Maryland Inc., Verizon New England Inc. and others
Defendant:
American PCS Communications LLC, Nextel of New York Inc., Nextel Communications of the Mid-Atlantic Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
v. VERIZON WASHINGTON, DC, INC. et al
as 1:2007cv01460
Plaintiff:
VERIZON WASHINGTON, DC, INC. and VERIZON WASHINGTON, DC, INC.
Defendant:
COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Verizon Delaware LLC et al v. Cavalier Telephone, LLC et al
as 1:2007cv00695
Plaintiff:
Verizon Delaware LLC, Verizon New Jersey Inc., Verizon Pennsylvania Inc. and others
Petitioner:
Verizon Maryland Inc.
Defendant:
Cavalier Telephone, LLC and Cavalier Telephone Mid-Atlantic, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Covad Comm Co, et al v. FCC, et al
as 05-1095
Petitioner:
Covad Communications Company and Dieca Communications, Inc., doing business as Covad Communications Company
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Terminated Party:
AT&T Corporation, ATX Licensing, Inc., Curry Communications, Inc. and others
Intervenor:
Ciena Corporation, Time Warner Telecom, Inc., Promoting Active Competition Everywhere Coalition and others
Intervenor For Petitioner:
Line Systems, Inc. and ATX Communications, Inc.
EarthLink Inc v. FCC, et al
as 05-1087
Petitioner:
EarthLink, Inc.
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Intervenor - Intervenor For Petitioner:
American Telephone and Telegraph Company
Intervenor:
BellSouth Corporation, Verizon Telephone Companies, Contel of the South, Inc., doing business as Verizon Mid-States and others
Terminated Party:
SBC Communications Inc. and MCI, Inc.
Virgin Is Tele Corp v. FCC, et al
as 04-1352
Petitioner:
Virgin Islands Telephone Corporation
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Intervenor:
AT&T Corporation
Intervenor For Petitioner:
National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc., United States Telecom Association, National Telecommunications Cooperative Association and others
Amicus Curiae For Petitioner:
BellSouth Corporation, SBC Communications Inc., Verizon Telephone Companies and others
Verizon Tele Co, et al v. FCC, et al
as 04-1331
Petitioner:
Verizon Telephone Companies, Contel of the South, Inc., doing business as Verizon Mid-States, GTE Midwest Incorporated, doing business as Verizon Midwest and others
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Intervenor:
AT&T Corporation
Verizon Tele Co, et al v. FCC, et al
as 03-1396
Petitioner:
Verizon Telephone Companies, Contel of the South, Inc., doing business as Verizon Mid-States, GTE Midwest Incorporated, doing business as Verizon Midwest and others
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Intervenor For Petitioner:
SBC Communications Inc.
Intervenor:
Z-Tel Communications, Inc., Qwest Communications International Inc., AT&T Corporation and others
AT&T Corp v. FCC, et al
as 03-1035
Petitioner:
AT&T Corporation
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Intervenor:
Verizon Telephone Companies, Contel of the South, Inc., doing business as Verizon Mid-States, GTE Midwest Incorporated, doing business as Verizon Midwest and others
AT&T Corp v. FCC, et al
as 03-1017
Petitioner:
AT&T Corporation
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Intervenor For Petitioner:
WorldCom Inc. and Sprint Corporation
Intervenor:
Contel of the South, Inc., doing business as Verizon Mid-States, GTE Midwest Incorporated, doing business as Verizon Midwest, GTE Southwest Incorporated, doing business as Verizon Southwest and others
Intervenor For Respondent:
BellSouth Public Communications, Inc. and SBC Communications Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
