Cases 1 - 10 of 78
Parra-Cajas, et al. v. Garland
as 23-4245
Petitioner:
FRANKLIN LEUDAN PARRA-CAJAS, VALESKA KAORI PARRA-SANCHEZ and RUTH KATHERINE SANCHEZ-TRUJILLO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Groundhog Enterprises, Inc. v. Faria et al
as 9:2023cv81308
Plaintiff:
GROUNDHOG ENTERPRISES, INC. doing business as MERCHANT LYNX SERVICES
Defendant:
Andre Faria, Valeska LLC and Swipe Fee Zero LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03897
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Gawain Baxter, et al v. David Miscavige, et al
as 23-90014
Petitioner:
GAWAIN BAXTER, LAURA BAXTER and VALESKA PARIS
Respondent:
DAVID MISCAVIGE, CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, INC., RELIGIOUS TECHNOLOGY CENTER, INC. and others
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Gawain Baxter, et al v. David Miscavige, et al
as 23-90013
Petitioner:
GAWAIN BAXTER, LAURA BAXTER and VALESKA PARIS
Respondent:
DAVID MISCAVIGE, CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, INC., RELIGIOUS TECHNOLOGY CENTER, INC. and others
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Lopez Bonilla v. Garland
as 22-1975
Petitioner:
YANETH VALESKA LOPEZ BONILLA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Baxter et al v. Miscavige et al
as 8:2022cv00986
Plaintiff:
Gawain Baxter, Laura Baxter and Valeska Paris
Defendant:
David Miscavige, Church of Scientology International, Inc., Religious Technology Center, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Marling Flores-Lopez v. U.S. Attorney General
as 20-13343
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner:
MARLING VALESKA FLORES-LOPEZ
Ferrer v. Radius International, Inc
as 1:2020cv21823
Plaintiff:
Valeska Ferrer
Defendant:
Radius International, Inc
Ferrer v. Radius International, Inc
as 1:2020cv21822
Plaintiff:
Valeska Ferrer
Defendant:
Radius International, Inc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
