Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Muhammad v. Wiles
as 23-50786
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Bilal Muhammad
Defendant / Appellee:
Richard Wiles, El Paso County Sheriff, Marco Vargas, Kevin Lanahan and others
USA v. Aniceto Varga
as 18-10549
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ANICETO BELTRAN VARGAS
Luciano Padilla v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 18-40216
Petitioner - Appellant:
LUCIANO VARGAS PADILLA
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
USA v. Junior Vargas-Guzman
as 17-40774
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JUNIOR RAFAEL VARGAS-GUZMAN
USA v. Rigoberto Munoz-Varga
as 16-41507
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RIGOBERTO MUNOZ-VARGAS
USA v. Aniceto Varga
as 16-10798
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ANICETO BELTRAN VARGAS, also known as Aniceto Vargas Beltran
USA v. Jorge Calderon-Cana
as 16-10457
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JORGE CALDERON-CANAS, also known as Sobrino, also known as Sottero Alanzo Franko, also known as Lucas Vargas Dias
Michael Fernandez v. Richard Wiles, et al
as 15-50346
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL FERNANDEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD WILES, County Sheriff, El Paso County, Texas, OFFICER FNU WESNINSKI, Commander, El Paso Jail Annex, OFFICER FNU LEGARETTA, El Paso Jail Annex and others
Benjamin Roark v. Regina Flannery, et al
as 14-41138
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BENJAMIN A. ROARK
Defendant - Appellee:
C. E. SAMUELS, Current Director of Bureau of Prisons, also known as Charles E. Samuels, MICHAEL J. CARVAJAL, Warden at FCI Texarkana, KEITH ROY, Warden, FCI Three Rivers and others
USA v. Jose Vargas-Soto
as 14-10456
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSE VARGAS-SOTO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
