Cases 1 - 10 of 58
USA v. Moises Vargas-Olivio
as 23-2526
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MOISES VARGAS-OLIVIO
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00895
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
Robert DentIn re: Robert Dent
as 22-3434
Petitioner:
In re: ROBERT WILSON DENT
Respondent:
TIMOTHY MORRIS, Police Officer, DARREN SMITH, YISLEIDY D. MINAYA-VARGAS, Reading Police Officer and others
SIEGEL et al v. PLATKIN et al
as 1:2022cv07463
Plaintiff:
AARON SIEGEL, JASON COOK, JOSEPH DELUCA and others
Defendant:
MATTHEW PLATKIN and PATRICK J. CALLAHAN
Amicus Curiae:
Brady
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Morgan v. AutoWeb, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01060
Plaintiff:
Anthony Morgan
Defendant:
AutoWeb, Inc., Michael J. Fuchs, Matas de Tezanos and others
VARGAS v. REY LOGISTICS INC.
as 2:2022cv04463
Plaintiff:
ERIC VARGAS
Defendant:
REY LOGISTICS INC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Thomas v. Spiegel et al
as 1:2022cv00457
Plaintiff:
Vonmarie Thomas
Defendant:
Evan Spiegel, Derek Andersen, Jeremi Gorman and others
Nominal Defendant:
Snap Inc.
Lucino Juarez-Vargas v. Attorney General United States of America
as 22-1338
Petitioner:
LUCINO JUAREZ-VARGAS
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Jesus Vargas v. Attorney General United States
as 21-2901
Petitioner:
JESUS DAVID VARGAS
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In Re RenovaCare, Inc. Securities Litigation
as 2:2021cv13766
Plaintiff:
GABRIELLE A BOLLER
Defendant:
RENOVACARE, INC., HARMEL RAYAT, THOMAS BOLD and others
In Re:
RENOVACARE, INC. SECURTIES LITIGATION
Petitioner:
JOEL MORRELL, MARC JAY GANNON and THOMAS AGOSTINELLI
Lead Plaintiff:
DIANA DEIDAN
Consolidated Plaintiff:
MELVIN EMBERLAND, ZOSER VARGAS and AVIVA MEYER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
